IPDebrief

84.54.71.139

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.5
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING: IP 84.54.71.139

Classification: Low Risk Target with High-Risk Subnet Environment

Date: Current

Source: IPDebrief Intelligence Platform

---

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IP 84.54.71.139 is classified as a low-risk address with no direct threat indicators, though it resides within a /24 subnet exhibiting elevated abuse density (47.4%). The address shows no open services, no blacklisting, and clean reputation metrics across all threat feeds. However, the neighboring infrastructure demonstrates significant malicious activity requiring contextual awareness.

---

RISK PROFILE

MetricValue
Overall Risk Score0
Provider Score0
Authority Score0
Stability Score0
Blacklist Count0
Threat Feed Matches0

Geolocation:

---

NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS

Infrastructure Classification:

DNS Status:

Control Plane:

Network Traceroute:

---

SUBNET ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS (84.54.71.0/24)

Abuse Density: 0.474 (47.4%)

Neighbor Count: 19

Risk Distribution in Subnet:

High-Risk Neighbor IPs (Risk Score β‰₯ 70):

---

OBSERVATION HISTORY

Nine signal observations recorded. Most recent observation (2026-07-29) indicates:

Historical data shows consistent low-risk classification for this specific IP despite subnet-level abuse activity.

---

RELATIONSHIP MAPPING

No direct relationships identified:

---

THREAT INDICATORS

Direct Threat Indicators:

---

RECOMMENDED SECURITY ACTIONS

For SOC Analysts:

1. Contextual Awareness: While 84.54.71.139 itself presents no direct threat, the high abuse density (47.4%) in its /24 subnet warrants monitoring for potential lateral movement or compromised infrastructure sharing.

2. Traffic Analysis: Implement monitoring for inbound/outbound connections from the 84.54.71.0/24 block, particularly to/from the 12 high-risk neighbor IPs identified.

3. Blocklist Evaluation: No immediate blocking required for this IP, but maintain awareness of subnet-level abuse patterns.

4. Log Correlation: Cross-reference any connection attempts with the high-risk neighbor IPs (84.54.71.3, 84.54.71.25, 84.54.71.34, 84.54.71.37, 84.54.71.38, 84.54.71.142, 84.54.71.145, 84.54.71.149, 84.54.71.152, 84.54.71.197) to identify potential coordinated activity.

5. Geographic Context: Boston-based address; correlate with other traffic patterns from US-MA region if applicable to threat hunting.

Firewall Recommendations:

---

CONFIDENCE LEVEL: High

Data Sufficiency: Moderate (control plane and ownership data limited)

Assessment: This IP address is currently benign but operates within a high-abuse subnet environment. SOC teams should monitor subnet-level activity while maintaining standard procedures for the target IP.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
RegionUS-MA
CityBoston
TimezoneAmerica/New_York
Latitude42.36
Longitude-71.06

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationRole of Uzbektelecom JSC
ASNAS8193
Network NameUZTELECOM
CIDR Block84.54.71.0/24
RIRRIPE
CountryUZ
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureResidential
Service PurposeResidential Endpoint
Network TierEnd-User β€” Residential ISP endpoint
Residential

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
25%
11
routing
25%
11
services
25%
11
ownership
0%
00
reputation
0%
00
geolocation
0%
00
Overall12%33
Coverage: 3/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: partial
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-07-23 01:42:00 UTC
Last Seen2026-07-30 23:21:05 UTC
Profile Built2026-07-29 16:41:54 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types14
Total Observations14
πŸ” 14 signal types Β· 14 observations collected
This report is generated from 14+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.