IPDebrief

85.203.21.239

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 85.203.21.239

Date: 2026-06-08

---

**1. Core Profile**

- Reported: Singapore (latitude 1.29, longitude 103.85).

- Validation: Geo plausibility failed (discrepancy between ownership registration in the Netherlands and geolocation).

---

**2. Network Behavior**

- Abuse Density: 0% (no reported abuse).

- Neighbor Risk: 86 IPs flagged as "medium" risk (40–50 score), 14 as "low" risk.

- Notable Neighbors:

- 85.203.21.2, 85.203.21.3, 85.203.21.4 (all medium risk).

- 85.203.21.11 (high risk, 70 score).

---

**3. Historical Observations**

- Minimal risk score (0.15) with DNSSEC validation.

- Geolocation data consistently reported as Singapore.

- No persistent malicious activity; 0 threat observations in 30-day history.

---

**4. Relationships & Threat Context**

- Subnet: 85.203.21.0/24 (owned by same entity).

- No linked domains, certificates, or organizations.

- Not listed in DNSBLs or threat intelligence platforms.

---

**5. Recommendations**

---

Conclusion: This IP appears benign but resides in a subnet with mixed risk profiles. Prioritize subnet-level monitoring and validate geolocation anomalies.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ Singapore
Regionβ€”
CitySingapore
TimezoneAsia/Singapore
Latitude1.35
Longitude103.82

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationJeroen van veen
ASNAS206092
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRRIPE
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
13%
11
routing
13%
11
services
13%
11
ownership
27%
23
reputation
13%
11
geolocation
13%
11
Overall16%78
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-16 21:01:37 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-22 06:39:44 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-08 03:23:10 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types17
Total Observations17
πŸ” 17 signal types Β· 17 observations collected
This report is generated from 17+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.