85.203.23.184📋 Copy

## IP Intelligence Briefing: 85.203.23.184/32

Classification: MODERATE RISK - Contextual Threat Elevation from Subnet

Risk Score: 40/100

Analysis Date: 2026-06-23

---

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IP address 85.203.23.184 presents a moderate-risk profile with contextual threat elevation derived from subnet-level abuse patterns. The address is currently firewalled with no active services but operates within a high-abuse density subnet (85.203.23.0/24) containing 79 identified threat siblings. Geographic inconsistencies between registered location (Singapore) and routing data (Dallas, US) warrant monitoring.

---

NETWORK OWNERSHIP & GEOLOCATION

Ownership:

• ASN: 137409
• Organization: VPN Consumer Singapore, Republic of Singapore
• RIR: RIPE
• Registration: Singapore-based

Geolocation Analysis:

• Primary consensus: Singapore (SG), coordinates 1.35°N, 103.82°E
• Historical signal (2026-06-18): Dallas, TX, US via AS36351 SoftLayer Technologies
• Routing origin: BGP prefix 85.203.23.0/24
• Notable: Geographic inconsistency between Singapore registration and US routing indicates potential multi-region infrastructure or routing anomalies

---

THREAT ASSESSMENT

Threat Indicators:

• Known attacker: No
• Spam source: No
• Tor exit node: No
• Proxy: No
• Host: No
• Blacklist count: 0 (control plane shows 1/8 DNSBL listings)

Risk Profile:

• Risk score: 40 (Moderate)
• Abuse confidence score: Not applicable
• Threat persistence: 0 days
• Is persistently malicious: No

---

NETWORK STATE & SERVICES

Service Status:

• Open ports: None detected
• Service classification: Firewalled / No Services
• TLS certificates: None
• HTTP services: None

DNS Analysis:

• PTR records: None
• Forward resolution: None
• Hosted domains: 0
• SPF/DMARC: Not configured
• Forward hostnames: None

Control Plane:

• Operator score: 0.1304 (Minimal)
• Route stability: False
• DNSSEC validation: True
• Route changes (30d): 0

---

SUBNET CONTEXT (85.203.23.0/24)

Abuse Density: 0.5032 (High Abuse Classification)

Subnet Statistics:

• Total sibling IPs: 157
• Active siblings: 49
• Threat siblings: 79

Risk Distribution:

• High risk: 0
• Medium risk: 53
• Low risk: 47

Implication: The subnet demonstrates elevated abuse activity. While 85.203.23.184 itself shows no active services, the contextual risk from neighboring addresses (including 85.203.23.50-57 with matching risk scores of 40) suggests this subnet warrants defensive attention.

---

OBSERVATION HISTORY

Signal Count: 18 observations

Recent Trend (2026-06-23): Minimal risk (0.15 operator score)

Historical Note: 2026-06-18 showed Dallas, TX geolocation with threat associations (AS36351)

Temporal Analysis:

• Ownership changes: 0
• Threat observation count: 1
• Classification: Not persistently malicious

---

RELATIONSHIP ANALYSIS

External Connections: 13 relationship entries

• All relationships classified as "Same Network"
• No external organization, hostname, or certificate associations
• No correlated threat campaigns identified

---

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

Defensive Posture:

1. Monitor subnet traffic patterns – High abuse density (0.5032) with 79 threat siblings suggests coordinated or adjacent malicious activity

2. Implement geo-blocking or rate-limiting for traffic originating from 85.203.23.0/24, particularly given geographic inconsistencies

3. Block or throttle if observed traffic patterns align with the subnet's abuse profile

4. Continue monitoring for service emergence – currently firewalled but could be repurposed

Firewall Rules (Recommended):

```bash

# Block subnet origin (high-abuse density context)

iptables -A INPUT -s 85.203.23.0/24 -j DROP

# OR implement rate limiting

iptables -A INPUT -s 85.203.23.0/24 -m limit --limit 5/min -j ACCEPT

# OR allow with logging for monitoring

iptables -A INPUT -s 85.203.23.0/24 -j LOG --log-prefix "85.203.23.0/24:"

```

---

INTELLIGENCE JUDGMENT

Threat Level: MODERATE (Contextual)

While 85.203.23.184 presents no immediate direct threat indicators, the subnet's high abuse density and geographic inconsistencies create elevated contextual risk. The IP should be monitored for traffic patterns and potential service activation. No immediate blocking is required, but defensive controls should be prepared for subnet-level incidents.

Priority: Medium – Monitor and prepare for potential subnet abuse incidents.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.