Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 91.137.27.30/32
Date: 2026-06-11
---
**1. IP Profile**
- Risk Score: 0 (Low Risk)
- Ownership: Assigned to MNT-TNETKOM (Germany) under ASN DE-TNETKOM-DSL-CUSTOMERS.
- Geolocation: Registered to London, UK (RIPE database), but ICMP validation failed (likely firewalled).
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports, TLS, or HTTP detected).
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity, spam, or known attacker associations.
---
**2. Observation History**
- Minimal Signals: Limited data points (9 observations) with low confidence (0.08β0.30).
- Stability: No ownership changes or persistent threats detected.
- Geo Validation: ICMP blocked; RTT measurements unavailable.
---
**3. Relationships**
- Network Link: Part of 91.137.16.0/20 subnet (MNT-TNETKOM DSL customers).
- No External Threat Links: No correlated IPs, domains, or certificates identified.
---
**4. Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet: 91.137.27.30/24.
- Neighbor Risk: 1 out of 1 sibling IP (91.137.27.140) has a risk score of 25 (Medium Risk).
- Abuse Density: Low (0% abuse in subnet).
---
**5. Recommendations**
- Monitor Neighbor: Investigate 91.137.27.140 for potential lateral movement or shared infrastructure risks.
- Verify Firewall Rules: Ensure 91.137.27.30 is explicitly allowed in security policies, given its firewalled state.
- Geolocation Validation: Confirm network ownerβs location (Germany vs. UK) to assess potential misconfigurations.
Conclusion: No immediate action required. The IP appears benign, but its subnet contains a medium-risk neighbor warranting further scrutiny.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | MNT-TNETKOM |
| ASN | AS199284 |
| Network Name | DE-TNETKOM-DSL-CUSTOMERS |
| CIDR Block | 91.137.16.0/20 |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | DE |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR | nat-91-137-27-30.net.encoline.de |
| Forward Confirmed | Yes β FCrDNS verified |
| Forward Hostnames | nat-91-137-27-30.net.encoline.de |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 40% (Fair) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| routing | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| services | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| geolocation | 19% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 7% | 4 | 5 |
Coverage: 2/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: partial
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (70%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-28 23:52:13 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-11 19:04:59 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-11 19:41:22 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 22 |
| Total Observations | 22 |
π 22 signal types Β· 22 observations collected
This report is generated from 22+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.