91.228.33.66
IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 91.228.33.66
*Generated via IPDebrief tools: Profile, History, Relationships, & Neighborhood Analysis*
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 55 (Moderate Risk)
- Ownership: Registered to MNT-INSITE-SPZOO (Vatus netname) under RIPE, Poland.
- Geolocation: Rozprza, ΕódΕΊ Voivodeship, Poland (51.92°N, 19.15°E).
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports, TLS/HTTP services, or DNS records).
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity detected (no DNSBL listings, spam, or known attacker campaigns).
---
**2. Observation History**
- Recent Activity (Last 30 Days):
- Listed in 3/8 DNSBLs (high severity risk).
- Valid DNSSEC records but no PTR hostname.
- BGP prefix 91.228.32.0/22 registered to Vatus (ASN 56838).
- No persistent threats or campaign correlations.
---
**3. Relationships**
- Network Affiliation: Part of the Vatus network (same ASN and BGP prefix).
- DNS: No associated PTR records or domain ownership.
- Certificates: No TLS/SSL certificates linked.
---
**4. Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet: 91.228.33.66/24
- Abuse Density: 25% of subnet has high/medium risk neighbors (15/60 IPs).
- Notable Neighbors:
- 91.228.33.5, 91.228.33.7, 91.228.33.17 (risk scores: 80β80).
- 91.228.33.13 (risk score: 55).
- Recommendation: Monitor subnet for lateral movement or shared infrastructure risks.
---
**5. Actionable Insights**
- No Direct Threat: IP shows no active malicious behavior (no open services, empty threat indicators).
- Subnet Risk: 25% abuse density suggests potential indirect risks; consider blocking the entire subnet or isolating it.
- DNSBL Listings: Investigate why the IP appears in 3 DNSBLs (e.g., misconfigured servers, spoofing).
- Geolocation: Verify if Rozprza-based infrastructure aligns with expected network operations.
---
Conclusion: While 91.228.33.66 itself is not malicious, its subnetβs abuse density and DNSBL presence warrant further investigation. Focus on subnet-level monitoring and validate DNSSEC/DNS configurations.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | MNT-INSITE-SPZOO |
| ASN | AS56838 |
| Network Name | Vatus |
| CIDR Block | 91.228.32.0/22 |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | PL |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| routing | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| services | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| geolocation | 23% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 8% | 4 | 5 |
Coverage: 2/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: partial
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-29 12:05:50 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-21 12:23:16 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-11 22:13:01 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 16 |
| Total Observations | 16 |
π 16 signal types Β· 16 observations collected
This report is generated from 16+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.