Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 91.236.172.24
Date: 2026-06-07
---
**1. Risk Assessment**
- Overall Risk Score: High (70/100)
- Threat Indicators: No direct malicious activity detected (no malware, phishing, or C2 indicators).
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports or TLS/HTTP services identified).
- DNSSEC Valid: Yes, but no DNS records or domain associations linked.
---
**2. Ownership & Geolocation**
- ASN: 60831 (ARKADIA - Arkadia Spolka Cywilna Krysztof Rozmus Barbara Rozmus, PL)
- Country: Poland (PL)
- Coordinates: Latitude 52.24, Longitude 21.04 (Warsaw time zone)
- Subnet: 91.236.172.0/22 (owned by ARKADIA)
---
**3. Threat Observations**
- DNSBL Listings: 4/8 (moderate risk of spam or abuse).
- BGP Prefix: 91.236.172.0/22 (stable route, no recent changes).
- Neighbor Subnet Abuse Density: 40% (mixed risk, 4 high-risk neighbors in /24).
---
**4. Neighborhood Analysis**
- High-Risk Neighbors (80/100):
- 91.236.172.41, 91.236.172.60, 91.236.172.107, 91.236.172.240
- Medium-Risk Neighbors (40β55/100):
- 91.236.172.17, 91.236.172.25, 91.236.172.26, 91.236.172.31, 91.236.172.42, 91.236.172.244
- Abuse Density: 40% (suggests potential for network compromise).
---
**5. Behavioral & Network Context**
- No Active Services: No open ports, TLS certs, or HTTP banners detected.
- No Campaign Links: No known malware families or phishing campaigns associated.
- Routing Stability: BGP route stable for 30 days, no recent changes.
---
**6. Recommended Actions**
- Monitor Subnet: High-risk neighbors suggest increased scrutiny of the 91.236.172.0/22 subnet.
- Check DNSBLs: Investigate 4 DNSBL listings (e.g., Spamhaus, Barracuda).
- Block IP: Consider blocking based on high-risk neighbor context, even if the IP itself is clean.
- Verify Ownership: Confirm ARKADIAβs legitimacy and network segmentation practices.
---
Conclusion: While the IP itself shows no direct malicious activity, its subnet has a 40% abuse density with multiple high-risk neighbors. This warrants closer monitoring and potential network segmentation to mitigate indirect risks.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | ATMAN-MNT |
| ASN | AS60831 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 35% | 2 | 2 |
| routing | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 19% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 22% | 8 | 10 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-16 08:57:55 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-25 07:55:36 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-07 22:21:54 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 14 |
| Total Observations | 14 |
π 14 signal types Β· 14 observations collected
This report is generated from 14+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.