91.240.254.172
IP Intelligence Briefing: 91.240.254.172
Date: 2026-06-11
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: Moderate (50/100)
- Ownership: Assigned to IP-RIPE (ASN 210976), netname *RU-TIMEWEB-20230627*. Abuse contact available via RDAP.
- Geolocation:
- Reported: Newark, NJ, US (via geolocation).
- Conflict: Historical observations (June 2, 2026) indicate Amsterdam, Netherlands. This discrepancy may signal spoofed geolocation, misconfigured routing, or multi-homed infrastructure.
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports, TLS, or HTTP detected).
---
**2. Threat & Behavior**
- Threat Indicators: None detected (no malware, phishing, or spam associations).
- DNS & Email: No DNSSEC validation errors, but SPF/DKIM records not configured. No email reputation data.
- Routing: BGP prefix *91.240.254.0/24*; route stability flagged as unstable (30-day volatility).
---
**3. Historical Observations**
- Geolocation Shifts:
- June 2, 2026: Amsterdam, Netherlands (maxmind-geolite2).
- June 11, 2026: Newark, NJ, US.
- Implication: Potential IP spoofing, misconfigured geolocation, or multi-region use.
- Ownership Stability: No ownership changes detected.
---
**4. Relationships & Neighbors**
- Network Affiliation: Linked to RU-TIMEWEB-20230627 (RIPE network).
- Subnet Neighbors:
- /24 Subnet: *91.240.254.0/24* (0 active neighbors reported).
- Abuse Density: 0% (no malicious neighbors).
---
**5. Recommendations**
1. Geolocation Verification: Investigate the geolocation discrepancy. Validate if the IP is part of a multi-homed setup or if spoofing is occurring.
2. Monitor Routing Stability: Track BGP route changes for *91.240.254.0/24* due to instability.
3. DNS & Email Security: Ensure DNSSEC and email authentication (SPF/DKIM) are configured for associated domains.
4. Subnet Analysis: Confirm the absence of neighbors in *91.240.254.0/24* is intentional (e.g., single-host use) or indicative of a misconfigured network.
Conclusion: No immediate threat detected, but geolocation inconsistencies and routing instability warrant further investigation.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | IP-RIPE |
| ASN | AS210976 |
| Network Name | RU-TIMEWEB-20230627 |
| CIDR Block | 91.240.254.0/25 |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | NL |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 30% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| geolocation | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 14% | 6 | 7 |
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-25 18:48:47 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-11 01:00:03 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-11 01:07:58 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 16 |
| Total Observations | 16 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.