IPDebrief

92.253.214.224

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 92.253.214.224

Risk Assessment: Moderate Risk (Score: 50). No active threat indicators detected, but classified as "mostly_clean" in its subnet.

Ownership & Geolocation:

Threat Analysis:

Network & Security Context:

- Block via iptables: `iptables -A INPUT -s 92.253.214.224 -j DROP`

- AWS WAF rule: Block `92.253.214.224/32` with description "IPDebrief risk 50".

Actionable Insight:

While no direct threats are observed, the IP’s moderate risk score and subnet’s low abuse density suggest monitoring is sufficient. Block the IP in security controls if further context (e.g., lateral movement, anomalous traffic) emerges. No immediate mitigation required based on current data.

Source: IPDebrief (https://ipdebrief.com) | Updated: 2026-06-11

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Ukraine
RegionKC
CityCherkessk
TimezoneEurope/Kyiv
Latitude49.84
Longitude24.02

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationLinkCom Networks NOC
ASNAS59577
Network NameLINKCOM-LVIV-NET
CIDR Block92.253.212.0/22
RIRRIPE
CountryUA
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierTier 3 β€” Basic operator with some routing infrastructure
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
42%
26
routing
61%
220
services
20%
22
ownership
30%
34
reputation
26%
13
geolocation
32%
23
Overall35%1238
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) β€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
⚠ Geo sources disagree on country: RU, UA

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-24 18:42:01 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-23 19:20:22 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-23 20:57:20 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types24
Total Observations70
πŸ” 24 signal types Β· 70 observations collected
This report is generated from 24+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.