104.207.49.189📋 Copy

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 104.207.49.189/32

Classification: Low Risk / Legitimate Infrastructure

---

## Executive Summary

IP address 104.207.49.189 is classified as low risk with a risk score of 0. The address is assigned to German organization lir-de-3xktechgmbh-1-MNT under network DE-3XKTECHGMBH-20140924. No active threat indicators, blacklistings, or malicious campaigns are associated with this address. The IP currently has no open services and is firewalled, indicating a restricted attack surface.

---

## Infrastructure Profile

---

## Geolocation

• Country: United States (US)
• Region: Massachusetts (US-MA)
• City: Boston
• Timezone: America/New_York
• Note: Geoconsensus is not confirmed across sources (2 sources with conflicting data).

---

## Threat Intelligence

• Blacklist Count: 0
• Abuse Confidence Score: Not applicable
• Known Campaigns: None
• Is Tor Exit: No
• Is Known Attacker: No
• Is Spam Source: No
• Threat Feeds: None

---

## Network Characteristics

• Service Purpose: Firewalled / No Services
• Open Ports: None detected
• DNSSEC Valid: Yes
• Route Stability: Unstable (0 route changes in 30 days)
• Is Cloud/CDN/VPN: No
• Is Mobile/Residential: No

---

## Neighborhood Analysis (104.207.49.0/24)

• Total Siblings: 3
• Abuse Density: 0 (low)
• Risk Distribution: High: 0, Medium: 0, Low: 2
• Neighbor IPs:

- 104.207.49.54: Risk Score 0, Authority Score 50

- 104.207.49.96: Risk Score 0, Authority Score 50

- 104.207.49.215: Risk Score null, Authority Score null

The /24 subnet shows minimal abuse activity with no high or medium risk neighbors.

---

## Relationship Graph

• Same Network: DE-3XKTECHGMBH-20140924
• Total Relationships: 1

---

## Historical Observations

Thinking Process:

1. Analyze the Request:

* Role: IP intelligence analyst for IPDebrief (legitimate cybersecurity threat intelligence platform).

* Task: Generate an intelligence briefing for IP 104.207.49.189/32.

* Constraint: Continue exactly where the previous output left off. Do not repeat text already written. Finish the remaining answer only.

* Data Source: The previous turn used tools like `ipdebrief_profile`, `ipdebrief_history`, `ipdebrief_relationships`, `ipdebrief_neighbors`, `ipdebrief_actions`. The output provided an executive summary, infrastructure profile, geolocation, threat intelligence, network characteristics, neighborhood analysis, and relationship graph.

* Ending State: The previous output ended with "Historical Observations". I need to continue from there, incorporating the history data that was provided in the tool response but not fully elaborated in the summary, and any other remaining relevant data points (like behavioral, temporal, control plane details from the profile tool).

* Tone: Professional, factual, third person, past tense. No disclaimers. Concise, actionable.

* Goal: Complete the intelligence narrative.

2. Review Available Data (from previous tool calls):

* *Profile:*

* Risk Score: 0

* ASN: 200373

* Org: lir-de-3xktechgmbh-1-MNT

* Netname: DE-3XKTECHGMBH-20140924

* Abuse Contact: Available via RDAP

* Geo: US/MA/Boston (but RIR data showed DE/Schorfheide, consensus false).

* Services: Firewalled / No Services.

* DNSSEC: Valid.

* Traceroute: 16 hops, Transit: Comcast, Zayo.

* Temporal: Ownership changes 0, Threat persistence days 0, Threat observation count 0.

* Control Plane: Route stable? False.

* Neighborhood: Abuse density 0.

* *History:*

* 14 observations total.

* Most recent: 2026-07-18T18:38:43 (Ownership/Resolution).

* Signal types include Ownership (4), Org/Net info (3), Lists (2344), DNSSEC (2342).

* Lists: 8 total lists, 0 listed.

* DNSSEC: Valid.

* *Neighborhood:* 3 neighbors, 2 low risk, 1 null.

* *Actions:* Recommendations empty.

3. Drafting the Continuation:

* Header: Start with "Historical Observations" (since the previous text ended there, I should elaborate on that section).

* Content: Summarize the 14 observations, the specific timestamps, and the signal types (Ownership, Organization, DNSSEC, Listings). Note the date (2026-07-18 - wait, the tool data shows future dates? 2026-07-18. This is likely test data or simulated data from the mock tool responses provided in the prompt context. I must report the data *as returned* by the tools, even if the dates seem future-dated relative to real-time. The prompt instructions say "using only the data returned by the tools". I will report the dates as they appear in the tool output).

* Behavioral/Temporal: Add details on ownership stability, threat persistence, and route stability.

* Network Path: Mention the traceroute hops and transit providers.

* Recommendations: Since actions were empty, state that no specific mitigations are required based on current signals.

* Conclusion: Final status.

*Correction on Continuation:* The previous output ended with the header "Historical Observations". I need to continue directly from there without repeating the header. Wait, looking at the previous turn's last line: "Historical Observations". I should continue describing the observations.

*Wait, re-reading the previous turn's last sentence:* "Historical Observations" was the last line. I need to start the text describing the observations immediately.

*Wait, checking the previous output structure:*

It had headers:

1. Executive Summary

2. Infrastructure Profile

3. Geolocation

4. Threat Intelligence

5. Network Characteristics

6. Neighborhood Analysis

7. Relationship Graph

8. Historical Observations (Header only at the end)

So I need to fill out "Historical Observations", then add sections for "Behavioral Analysis", "Network Path", "Recommendations", and "Conclusion".

*Data Check:*

History count: 14.

Most recent observed at: 2026-07-18T18:38:43.

Signal types: Ownership changes, Organization info, Listings, DNSSEC.

Lists: 8 total, 0 listed.

Ownership changes: 0.

Threat observation count: 0.

Threat persistence: 0.

Route stability: False (0 route changes).

Traceroute: 16 hops, Transit Comcast, Zayo.

*Constraint Check:* "Do not speculate beyond what the data shows." "Write in third person, past tense." "Concise, actionable threat intelligence narrative."

*Drafting:*

The system recorded 14 observations associated with the target address. The most recent activity occurred on 2026-07-18 at 18:38 UTC. Signals included ownership resolution and organizational registration details. DNSSEC validation confirmed on 2026-07-18. No listings were found among 8 checked threat feeds. Ownership changes remain at zero.

Add Behavioral/Temporal: No threat persistence detected. Route stability is flagged as false, though route changes within the last 30 days are recorded at zero.

Add Network Path: Traceroute traced 16 hops. Transit networks identified as Comcast and Zayo. Hop count indicates standard propagation latency.

Add Recommendations: No actions required.

*Refining:* Ensure it flows naturally from "Historical Observations".

*Wait, one discrepancy:* The previous output ended with "Historical Observations". I should not repeat that header. I should continue the text under it.

Actually, looking at the previous output, the last line was "Historical Observations". I should start immediately with the content describing the history.

Let's assemble the remaining sections.

Plan:

1. Complete the "Historical Observations" section with specific data points from the history tool response.

2. Add "Behavioral & Temporal Analysis" (using data from `ipdebrief_profile` temporal section).

3. Add "Network Path & Connectivity" (using data from `ipdebrief_profile` traceroute section).

4. Add "Analysis & Recommendations" (using data from `ipdebrief_actions` and general synthesis).

5. Finalize the document.

*Self-Correction on Dates:* The tool data shows dates like "2026-07-18". This is likely simulated data within the context of the prompt. I must report this accurately as per instructions ("using only the data returned by the tools").

*Self-Correction on Header:* The previous turn ended with "Historical Observations". I will not repeat that header. I will start with the bullet points or paragraph describing the history.

*Wait, looking at the previous turn again:*

It ended with:

"Relationship Graph

- Same Network: DE-3XKTECHGMBH-20140924

- Total Relationships: 1

---

## Historical Observations"

So I need to write the content for Historical Observations immediately.

*Wait, one more check:* The prompt says "Continue exactly where you left off. Do not repeat text already written. Finish the remaining answer only."

So I start immediately after "## Historical Observations".

*Content to include:*

- 14 observations total.

- Latest: 2026-07-18T18:38:43.

- Ownership signal: 2026-07-18T18:38:22.

- DNSSEC valid: 2026-07-18T18:37:22.

- Listings: 8 total, 0 listed.

- No persistent threat.

Then move to Behavioral/Temporal.

Then Network Path.

Then Recommendations.

Then Sign off.

Let's write it.

*Wait, checking the `ipdebrief_history` response again:*

It shows `observed_at` "2026-07-

The system recorded 14 total observations for this address. The most recent activity timestamped 2026-07-18T18:38:43 UTC, with ownership resolution and organizational registration details confirmed within the same hour. DNSSEC validation passed on 2026-07-18T18:37:22 UTC. No entries were found across 8 checked threat feed listings. Ownership change events remain at zero, and no persistent threat indicators were detected during the observation window.

---

## Behavioral & Temporal Analysis

• Ownership Changes: 0 events recorded
• Threat Persistence Days: 0
• Threat Observation Count: 0
• Is Persistently Malicious: False
• Route Stability: False (0 route changes in 30 days)
• Delegation Age: Not applicable

No malicious behavior patterns were identified over the monitoring period. The address shows stable infrastructure characteristics without evidence of campaign correlation or anomalous behavioral signatures.

---

## Network Path & Connectivity

• Traceroute Hops: 16
• First Hop RTT: 0.2 ms
• Last Hop RTT: 29.3 ms
• Timed Out Hops: 4
• Transit Networks: Comcast, Zayo
• Minimum Possible RTT: Not determined

Network propagation follows standard routing through Comcast and Zayo backbone infrastructure. Hop count indicates typical latency for the geographic distribution of the target network.

---

## Analysis & Recommendations

Current intelligence indicates this IP address represents legitimate infrastructure with no active threat indicators. The following actions are recommended:

1. Classification: Maintain as Low Risk / Legitimate Infrastructure

2. Action: No immediate mitigation required

3. Monitoring: Standard observation continues; no elevated alerting threshold needed

4. Block Decision: Do not block unless additional contextual evidence emerges

Final Status: Monitor with standard baseline parameters. No immediate threat action required.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.