119.73.116.224📋 Copy

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 119.73.116.224

## Executive Summary

IP address 119.73.116.224 presents a MODERATE RISK profile (Risk Score: 40) with no active threat indicators. The IP belongs to the Naqashband network owned by TEC-DATA CORE ENGINEERING TEAM and is geolocated to Faisalabad, Pakistan. The subnet shows low abuse density (0.0), with most neighbors classified as low risk.

---

## Infrastructure Profile

---

## Network Classification & Services

• Network Role: Firewalled / No Services
• Cloud/CDN/VPN: No
• Proxy/Tor/Hosting: No
• Open Ports: None detected
• TLS Certificate: None
• HTTP Banner: None
• DNS Records: 1 PTR hostname (static-host119-73-116-224.link.net.pk)
• Email Authentication: No SPF or DMARC records configured

---

## Threat Intelligence Assessment

Risk Indicators:

• Risk Score: 40/100 (Moderate Risk)
• Abuse Confidence: Not available
• Blacklist Count: 0
• DNSBL Listed: 2 of 8 lists
• Known Campaigns: None
• Tor Exit Node: No
• Known Attacker: No
• Spam Source: No

Control Plane Analysis:

• Operator Score: 0.2609 (Basic)
• Route Stability: False
• RPKI State: Not available
• DNSSEC Valid: Yes

---

## Neighborhood Analysis (119.73.116.0/24)

The target IP resides in a /24 subnet containing 33 neighbor IPs:

• High Risk: 0
• Medium Risk: 6 IPs (Risk Score 25-40)
• Low Risk: 27 IPs

Notable Neighbors:

• 119.73.116.8, 119.73.116.135, 119.73.116.149, 119.73.116.166, 119.73.116.167, 119.73.116.200 (Risk Score: 40)
• 119.73.116.33, 119.73.116.38, 119.73.116.175, 119.73.116.242 (Risk Score: 25)

Subnet Abuse Density: 0.0

---

## Relationship Graph

The IP has 4 relationships:

• Same Network: Naqashband (2 occurrences)
• DNS Association: static-host119-73-116-224.link.net.pk (2 occurrences)

No organizational, hostname, or certificate relationships detected beyond the immediate network and DNS associations.

---

## Historical Observations

Total Observations: 12

Most Recent Signals (2026-07-27):

• Geolocation: Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan (Confidence: 70%)
• Operator Score: Basic (0.2609) (Confidence: 60%)
• Ownership: TEC-DATA CORE ENGINEERING TEAM (Confidence: 90-95%)
• Network Registration: 119.73.112.0/20 via APNIC (Confidence: 90-95%)

Temporal Analysis:

• Ownership Changes: 0
• Threat Persistence Days: 0
• Threat Observation Count: 0
• Persistently Malicious: No

---

## Recommended Actions

Based on the moderate risk profile and absence of active threat indicators:

Firewall Recommendations:

```bash

# iptables

iptables -A INPUT -s 119.73.116.224 -j DROP

# nftables

nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 119.73.116.224 drop

# nginx

deny 119.73.116.224;

# pfSense

119.73.116.224/32

# Cloudflare WAF

{

"description": "Block 119.73.116.224 — IPDebrief risk score 40",

"action": "block",

"filter": {"expression": "ip.src eq 119.73.116.224"}

}

# AWS WAF

{

"Addresses": ["119.73.116.224/32"],

"Description": "IPDebrief risk 40"

}

```

---

## Assessment & Recommendations

Current Status: Moderate Risk

Key Findings:

1. The IP has no known malicious indicators but is flagged on 2 DNSBL lists

2. No active services or open ports detected (firewalled configuration)

3. Subnet abuse density is minimal (0.0)

4. Ownership and geolocation are stable with no recent changes

5. No threat campaigns or correlated IPs identified

SOC Action:

• Implement blocking rules as a precautionary measure
• Monitor for any changes in network activity
• No immediate escalation required given the absence of active threat indicators
• Consider whitelist evaluation if legitimate business traffic is expected from

from the Naqashband network range.

---

## Final Assessment

The IP address 119.73.116.224 maintains a MODERATE RISK classification with no evidence of active malicious behavior. The absence of open services, combined with zero threat observations and minimal subnet abuse density, supports a DEFENSIVE MONITORING posture rather than immediate aggressive blocking.

Priority Levels:

• Immediate Action: Monitor for activity changes
• Short-term: Evaluate whitelist requirements if business traffic exists
• Long-term: Maintain current filtering posture

Conclusion: This IP represents a low-severity concern that may warrant firewall blocking as a precautionary measure based on its DNSBL presence and moderate risk score. However, the lack of active threat indicators, zero known campaigns, and stable network ownership suggest limited malicious intent. SOC teams should correlate with local traffic patterns before implementing blocking rules.

---

*Intelligence Report Generated: IPDebrief Platform*

*Data Sources: MaxMind GeoIP2, APNIC RIR Database, DNSBL Aggregates, Historical Traffic Correlation*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.